journal article Show
Journal of Business Ethics Vol. 127, No. 4, Festschrift on Richard T. De George (April 2015) , pp. 723-735 (13 pages) Published By: Springer https://www.jstor.org/stable/24702824 Read and download Log in through your school or library Abstract Given a huge variety of international relations in the age of globalization, business ethics needs to take them seriously in a differentiated way with great sensitivity and sophisticated understanding. This essay proposes to structure the field of business ethics by distinguishing three levels of analysis and four types of international relations. It builds on Richard T. De George's pioneering work as an early leader in the field of business ethics. It is hoped that such differentiation may help to better identify the ethical responsibilities of all actors in business and the economy. The first part explains the extended three-level conception of business ethics with four types of international relations. The second part shows De George's contribution to substantiate this conceptual framework. And the third part discusses the significance of this framework for better ways of securing human rights in international relations. Journal Information The Journal of Business Ethics publishes original articles from a wide variety of methodological and disciplinary perspectives concerning ethical issues related to business. Since its initiation in 1980, the editors have encouraged the broadest possible scope. The term 'business' is understood in a wide sense to include all systems involved in the exchange of goods and services, while 'ethics' is circumscribed as all human action aimed at securing a good life. Systems of production, consumption, marketing, advertising, social and economic accounting, labour relations, public relations and organisational behaviour are analysed from a moral viewpoint. The style and level of dialogue involve all who are interested in business ethics – the business community, universities, government agencies and consumer groups. Speculative philosophy as well as reports of empirical research are welcomed. In order to promote a dialogue between the various interested groups as much as possible, papers are presented in a style relatively free of specialist jargon. Publisher Information Springer is one of the leading international scientific publishing companies, publishing over 1,200 journals and more than 3,000 new books annually, covering a wide range of subjects including biomedicine and the life sciences, clinical medicine, physics, engineering, mathematics, computer sciences, and economics. Rights & Usage This item is part of a
JSTOR Collection. What is a drawback of the utilitarian approach to business ethics quizlet?Which of the following is a drawback of the utilitarian approach to business ethics? It omits the consideration of justice.
Which of the following is a straw man approach to business ethics?The straw men approaches to business ethics consist of Friedman doctrine, the righteous moralist, cultural relativism, and naive moralist (Wyld 1-3).
Which of the following statements is true of the utilitarian approach to business ethics?Which of the following statements is true about the utilitarian approach to business ethics? Correct It recognizes that a business should pursue only those actions where the social benefits outweigh the costs.
Which of the following is most likely to lead to unethical decision making quizlet?Situational influences, which are external factors (e.g., environmental or cultural elements), can shape our thinking, decision making, and behavior and are more likely to lead to unethical behavior than internal traits or character.
|
A multinational corporation that adopts the naive immoralist approach to ethics will most likely
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 IlerngutCOM Inc.
