The current article acknowledges the absence of followership from the leadership literature for many years. Major theories of leadership are reviewed to assert that (1) modern leadership studies have been developed strictly from the leader’s perspective with little or no attention on followership, (2) leadership studies have primarily been based on the static understanding of leadership (leaders always remain leaders),1 and (3) there seems to be a need for a new paradigm for leader–follower relationships, which may result in organic relationships between leaders and followers through exchange of leadership and followership functions and roles. Thus, it is argued that the mutuality of relationships and infl uence between the follower and the leader exists. To address the need for a new paradigm for leadership, the leader–follower trade (LFT) approach is introduced, which may result in the nonstatic and organic approach to leadership–followership as two valuable human behavioral functions. In this case, leadership and followership functions and roles may be traded or exchanged by the positional leaders and followers in different situations or organizational settings toward mutual respect, empowerment, and effectiveness. Show
Recommended textbook solutions Algebra and Trigonometry5th EditionRobert F. Blitzer 10,851 solutions Business Math17th EditionMary Hansen 3,684 solutions College Algebra Enhanced with Graphing Utilities6th EditionMichael Sullivan, Michael Sullivan III 7,231 solutions
Elementary Linear Algebra11th EditionHoward Anton 2,914 solutions Recommended textbook solutions
Service Management: Operations, Strategy, and Information Technology7th EditionJames Fitzsimmons, Mona Fitzsimmons 103 solutions
Human Resource Management15th EditionJohn David Jackson, Patricia Meglich, Robert Mathis, Sean Valentine 249 solutions
Human Resource Management15th EditionJohn David Jackson, Patricia Meglich, Robert Mathis, Sean Valentine 249 solutions
Information Technology Project Management: Providing Measurable Organizational Value5th EditionJack T. Marchewka 346 solutions Which level of group development is characterized by dissatisfaction with the group?Storming. The storming stage is the one most often characterized by group conflict and dysfunction. It is often where the preliminary expectations and boundaries are challenged as individuals learn more about each other's motivations.
What is the difference between groups and teams?A group is a collection of individuals who coordinate their efforts, while a team is a group of people who share a common goal. While similar, the two are different when it comes to decision-making and teamwork. In a work group, group members are independent from one another and have individual accountability.
Which are usually larger groups or teams?Which are usually larger, groups or teams? Groups are usually larger because they can have any number of members.
What is the name for two or more members with a clear leader who perform independent jobs with individual accountability evaluation and rewards?A group is two or more members, with a clear leader, who perform independent jobs and experience individual accountability, evaluation, and rewards.
|
Command groups do not usually reach the ______ stage, unless there is some drastic reorganization.
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 IlerngutCOM Inc.
