Cost leadership Show When an organization competes on the basis of having the lowest costs (costs or expenses, not prices) in its industry, it's following a cost leadership strategy. A low-cost leader is highly efficient. Overhead is kept to a minimum, and the firm does everything it can to cut costs. A company that competes by offering unique products that are widely valued by customers is following a differentiation strategy. Product differences might come from exceptionally high quality, extraordinary service, innovative design, technological capability, or an unusually positive brand image. Practically any successful consumer product or service can be identified as an example of the differentiation strategy. Although these two competitive strategies are aimed at the broad market, the final type of competitive strategy—the focus strategy—involves a cost advantage (cost focus) or a differentiation advantage (differentiation focus) in a narrow segment or niche. Segments can be based on product variety, customer type, distribution channel, or geographical location. What happens if an organization can't develop a cost or a differentiation advantage? Porter called that being stuck in the middle and warned that's not a good place to be. An organization becomes stuck in the middle when its costs are too high to compete with the low-cost leader or when its products and services aren't differentiated enough to compete with the differentiator. Getting unstuck means choosing which competitive advantage to pursue and then doing so by aligning resource, capabilities, and core competencies. Recommended textbook solutions Principles of Economics7th EditionN. Gregory Mankiw 1,394 solutions Introductory Business Statistics1st EditionAlexander Holmes, Barbara Illowsky, Susan Dean 2,174 solutions Financial Accounting4th EditionDon Herrmann, J. David Spiceland, Wayne Thomas 1,097 solutions Essentials of Investments9th EditionAlan J. Marcus, Alex Kane, Zvi Bodie 689 solutions international strategy:A strategy based on firm's diffusion and adaptation of the parent companies knowledge and expertise to foreign markets, used in industries where the pressures for both local adaptation and lowering costs are low. Mcdonals and Kellogg, have certain attributes that can't be simulated. Leverage and diffusion of a parent firms knowledge and core competencies, lower costs because of less need to tailor products. Cons: Limited ability to adapt to local markets, inability to take advantage of new ideas and innovations occurring in local markets Global:strive to offer standardized products and services as well as to locate manufacturing, RD, and marketing activities in only a few locations. Primary emphasis is on controlling costs, and used in industries where the pressure for local adaptation is low and the pressure for lowering costs is high. Pharmaceuticals, aerospace, semiconductors. Strong integration across various businesses, standardization leads to higher economies of scale, helps create uniform standards of quality throughout the world. Cons: can't adapt to local market, concentration fof activities may increase dependence on single facility, single locations may lead to higher tariffs and transportation costs Multidomestic: Based on differentiating their products and services to adapt to local markets, used in industries, where the pressure for local adaptation is high and the pressure for lowering costs is low. Pros: Ability to adapt products and services to local market conditions, ability to detect potential opportunities for attractive niches in a given market, enhancing revenue. Cons: Decreased ability to realize cost savings through scale economies, greater difficulty in transferring knowledge across countries, may lead to "over adaptation" as conditions change. Transnational: based on firm's optimizing the trade offs associated with efficiency, local adaptation, and learning, used in industries where the pressures for both local adaptation and lowering costs are high. Pros: ability to attain economies of scale, adapt to local markets, locate activiites in optimal locations, and increase knowledge flows and learning. Cons: Unique challenges in determining optimal locations of activities to ensure cost and quality, unique managerial challenges in fostering knowledge transfer In what way does the cost leadership strategy provide competitive advantage?As its name might imply, cost leadership allows a competitive edge by manipulating production costs. It does this in two important ways: Charging lower prices to increase market share. This is done by casting the company as a low-cost alternative, which increases both sales and the company's profile.
What are the advantages of a cost leadership strategy quizlet?Cost leadership→ A firm pursuing a cost-leadership strategy attempts to gain a competitive advantage primarily by reducing its economic costs below its competitors. oThis strategy calls for being the low cost producer in an industry for a given level of quality.
What is cost leadership in competitive strategy?Definition: Cost leadership is a term used when a company projects itself as the cheapest manufacturer or provider of a particular product or commodity in a competition. It is difficult to deploy the strategy because the management must constantly work on reducing cost at every level to remain competitive.
What is cost leadership strategy with example?A firm following a cost leadership strategy offers products or services with acceptable quality and features to a broad set of customers at a low price (Table 6.2). Super Shoes, for example, sells name-brand shoes at inexpensive prices. Little Debbie snack cakes offer another example.
|
In what way does the cost leadership strategy provide competitive advantage quizlet?
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 IlerngutCOM Inc.
