journal article Show International Studies Quarterly Vol. 57, No. 3 (September 2013) , pp. 620-634 (15 pages) Published By: Wiley https://www.jstor.org/stable/24017929 Read and download Log in through your school or library Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $39.00 USD. How does it work?
Abstract Unlike many other social sciences, international relations (IR) spend relatively little time assessing the impact of the nineteenth century on its principal subject matter. As a result, the discipline fails to understand the ways in which a dramatic reconfiguration of power during the "long nineteenth century" served to recast core features of international order. This article examines the extent of this lacuna and establishes the ways in which processes of industrialization, rational state-building, and ideologies of progress served to destabilize existing forms of order and promote novel institutional formations. The changing character of organized violence is used to illustrate these changes. The article concludes by examining how IR could be rearticulated around a more pronounced engagement with "the global transformation." Journal Information International Studies Quarterly, an official journal of the International Studies Association, seeks to acquaint a broad audience of readers with the best research being done in the variety of intellectual traditions included under the rubric of international studies. Therefore, the editors welcome all submissions addressing this community's theoretical, empirical, and normative concerns. First preference will continue to be given to articles that address and contribute to important disciplinary and interdisciplinary questions and controversies. JSTOR provides a digital archive of the print version of International Studies Quarterly. Publisher Information Wiley is a global provider of content and content-enabled workflow solutions in areas of scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly research; professional development; and education. Our core businesses produce scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly journals, reference works, books, database services, and advertising; professional books, subscription products, certification and training services and online applications; and education content and services including integrated online teaching and learning resources for undergraduate and graduate students and lifelong learners. Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has been a valued source of information and understanding for more than 200 years, helping people around the world meet their needs and fulfill their aspirations. Wiley has published the works of more than 450 Nobel laureates in all categories: Literature, Economics, Physiology or Medicine, Physics, Chemistry, and Peace. Wiley has partnerships with many of the world’s leading societies and publishes over 1,500 peer-reviewed journals and 1,500+ new books annually in print and online, as well as databases, major reference works and laboratory protocols in STMS subjects. With a growing open access offering, Wiley is committed to the widest possible dissemination of and access to the content we publish and supports all sustainable models of access. Our online platform, Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) is one of the world’s most extensive multidisciplinary collections of online resources, covering life, health, social and physical sciences, and humanities. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. How were the European empires of the nineteenthMilitary defeat shook confidence in the old gods and local practices. How were the European empires of the nineteenth century similar to earlier European empires in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries? Both enlisted the cooperation of the colonized population.
What facilitated European expansion in Asia in the 19th century?Which in the following facilitated European expansion in Asia in the nineteenth century? Europe's development of new military technologies.
Which of the following was an outcome of European rule in the nineteenthWhich of the following was an outcome of European rule in the nineteenth century? European colonial rulers emphasized Western education in the colonies, resulting in a new elite that displaced traditional elites.
How did Europeans view their colonial subjects in the nineteenthHow did Europeans view their colonial subjects in the nineteenth century? Europeans viewed their colonial subjects as inferior races. Europeans admired the sophistication and superiority of local cultures.
|
In which of the following periods did European overseas expansion most closely resemble that of the nineteenth century?
Urheberrechte © © 2024 IlerngutCOM Inc.
