To succeed on a promissory estoppel claim and plaintiff must show select all that apply

journal article

The Cambridge Law Journal

Vol. 42, No. 2 (Nov., 1983)

, pp. 257-278 (22 pages)

Published By: Cambridge University Press

//www.jstor.org/stable/4506557

This is a preview. Log in through your library.

Journal Information

The Cambridge Law Journal publishes articles on all aspects of law. Special emphasis is placed on contemporary developments, but the journal's range includes jurisprudence and legal history. An important feature of the journal is the Case and Comment section, in which members of the Cambridge Law Faculty and other distinguished contributors analyse recent judicial decisions, new legislation and current law reform proposals. The articles and case notes are designed to have the widest appeal to those interested in the law - whether as practitioners, students, teachers, judges or administrators - and to provide an opportunity for them to keep abreast of new ideas and the progress of legal reform. Each issue also contains an extensive section of book reviews. Current issues of the journal are available at //www.journals.cambridge.org/clj

Publisher Information

Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries. Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit //journals.cambridge.org.

What Is Promissory Estoppel?

Promissory estoppel is the legal principle that a promise is enforceable by law, even if made without formal consideration when a promisor has made a promise to a promisee who then relies on that promise to his subsequent detriment. Promissory estoppel is intended to stop the promisor from arguing that an underlying promise should not be legally upheld or enforced.

The doctrine of promissory estoppel is part of the law in the United States and other countries, although the precise legal requirements for promissory estoppel vary not only between countries, but also between different jurisdictions, such as states, within the same country.

Key Takeaways

• Estoppel is a legal principle that keeps people and businesses from, essentially, going back on their word or promise.
• Promissory estoppel helps injured parties to recover on promises made that have led to economic loss when not met.
• Promissory estoppel helps injured parties recover damages they suffer due to broken promises by another party.
• Promissory estoppel has different applications in different jurisdictions, so it is important to consult a lawyer before considering a case.

What Is Estoppel?

Understanding Promissory Estoppel

Promissory estoppel serves to enable an injured party to recover on a promise. There are common legally required elements for a person to make a claim for promissory estoppel: a promisor, a promisee, and a detriment that the promisee has suffered. An additional requirement is that the person making the claim—the promisee—must have reasonably relied on the promise. In other words, the promise was one that a reasonable person would ordinarily rely on.

Another requirement further qualifies the required detriment component; the promisee must have suffered an actual substantial detriment in the form of an economic loss that results from the promisor failing to deliver on their promise. Finally, promissory estoppel is usually only granted if a court determines that enforcing the promise is essentially the only means by which injustice to the promisee can be rectified.

An example of promissory estoppel might be applied in a case where an employer makes an oral promise to an employee to pay the employee a specified monthly or annual amount of money throughout the full duration of the employee's retirement. If the employee then subsequently retires based on a reliance on the employer's promise, the employer could be legally estopped from not delivering on his promise to make the specified retirement payments.

Requirements of Promissory Estoppel

There are three key ingredients for a legal case involving promissory estoppel: the promisor, the promisee, and promise that was not kept. In order to seek damages based on promissory estoppel, a plaintiff must show that:

1. The promisor made a promise, with the intention that a reasonable person would act on it;
2. The promisee believed the promisor, and acted on that promise in good faith;
3. The promisor later reneged on that promise causing financial harm to the promisee; and
4. The nature of the promise is such that the only way to avoid injustice is by enforcing the promise.
   

Promissory Estoppel as a Part of Contract Law

Contract law generally requires that a person receive consideration for making a promise or agreement. Legal consideration is a valuable asset that is exchanged between two parties to a contract at the time of a promise or agreement.

Ordinarily, some form of consideration, either an exchange of money or a promise to refrain from some action, is required for a contract to be legally enforceable. However, in attempting to ensure justice or fairness, a court may enforce a promise even in the absence of any consideration, provided that the promise was reasonably relied on and that reliance on the promise resulted in a detriment to the promisee.

Example of Promissory Estoppel

As a hypothetical example, imagine a person working in New York who seeks a new job. After a certain number of interviews, they receive a job offer from an employer in California offering a high salary and relocation expenses. The prospective employee immediately quits their job, ends their tenancy, and begins to relocate to California.

Upon arrival in California, they learn that the job is no longer available, or has a greatly reduced salary. Because the employee relied on the employer's promise, they may be able to seek judicial relief for the expenses they incurred due to the employer's promise. As with other aspects of contract law, promissory estoppel is state-specific, so the employee would do best to consult a California attorney before pursuing legal action.

What Is the Difference Between a Contract and Promissory Estoppel?

In contract law, the doctrine of consideration states that there must be an exchange of consideration in order for a contract to be enforced. If one party fails to uphold their end of a contract, the other party can withdraw from that contract.
Promissory estoppel is the exception to this rule. Under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, even the existence of a promise may be sufficient to enforce an agreement, if the other party has suffered damage as a result of acting on that promise.

What Is Equitable Estoppel?

Equitable estoppel is a legal doctrine that prevents a party from taking a position that is contrary to their previous position, if doing so harms the other party. This rule prevents someone from going back on their word in a court of law.

What Damages Can Be Recovered in Promissory Estoppel?

The rules for promissory estoppel vary by jurisdiction. Generally speaking, a successful case of promissory estoppel may result in the award of either reliance damages or expectation damages. Reliance damages are based on what it would cost to restore the promisee to their economic position before they relied on the broken promise, while expectation damages are based on the cost of putting the injured party in the same position as if the promise had been fulfilled.

The Bottom Line

Promissory estoppel is a legal doctrine that says parties may be liable for broken promises that result in financial harm. As with other legal issues, promissory estoppel cases are highly specific, meaning that it is worth consulting an attorney before pursuing legal action.

What elements are required for the promissory estoppel doctrine to apply choose all that apply?

Which of the following is a requirement for promissory estoppel quizlet?

What elements are required for courts to apply the doctrine of promissory estoppel choose 3 answers?

Which of the following is not a requirement for promissory estoppel?