Use the law of detachment to draw a logical conclusion from the two given statements

Ask your own question, for FREE!

Mathematics 45 Online

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Use the law of detachment to draw a logical conclusion from the two given statements. If not possible, choose not possible. If it is sunny, then I will have a picnic. Today it is sunny. A. I will have a picnic today B. If I am having a picnic, it must be sunny C. If it is not sunny, then I will not have a picnic D. Not possible I believe that it is A or D

8 years ago

Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!

Sign Up

OpenStudy (perl):

Law of detachment if p then q p ------------------ q

8 years ago

OpenStudy (perl):

here p = it is sunny q= I will have a picnic.

8 years ago

OpenStudy (perl):

can you answer it now ?

8 years ago

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah thank you :)

8 years ago

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!

  • Kunduz
  • Questions
  • Math
  • Basic Math
  • Use the Law of Detachment to draw a logical conc...

Last updated: 7/17/2022

Use the Law of Detachment to draw a logical conclusion from the two given statements. If not possible, choose not possible. If it is sunny, then I will have a picnic. Today it is sunny. I will have a picnic today. I am having a picnic, it must be sunny. If it is not sunny, then I will not have a picnic. not possible

Show Answer

Create an account. Get free access to expert answers

  • Get 3 free question credits
  • Claim your daily rewards
  • Ask your questions by snapping

Already have an account? Login

In order to win a debate or an argument, you must have sound fact and reasoning as to why you are convinced you are right. It’s not enough to just believe you are right, you have to prove it.

Jenn, Founder Calcworkshop®, 15+ Years Experience (Licensed & Certified Teacher)

Therein lies the difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.

Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning uses patterns and observations to draw conclusions, and it’s much like making an educated guess.

Whereas, deductive reasoning uses facts, definitions and accepted properties and postulates in a logical order to draw appropriate conclusions.

Geometry Logic Statements

There are two laws of logic involved in deductive reasoning:

  1. Law of Detachment
  2. Law of Syllogism

To better understand these two ideas, let’s take a deeper look.

The Law of Detachment

Law of Detachment Definition

Definition

If p equals q and p is also true. Then q is true.

Example

If a bird is the largest of all birds then it is flightless.
And if an ostrich is the largest living bird.
Then an ostrich is flightless.

The Law of Syllogism

Law of Syllogism Definition

Definition

If p equals q and if q equals r, then p equals r.

Example

If you wear school colors, then you have school spirit.
If you have school spirit, then you feel great.
If you wear school colors, then you feel great.

Using these two logic laws we are able to write conclusions and provide reasons for our statements using more than just intuition but sound fact.

Together we will look at countless examples of how to provide conclusions and reasons for such arguments as:

  • Collinear Points
  • Congruent Angles
  • Angle Bisectors
  • And more!

And more importantly, deductive reasoning, is the way in which geometric proofs are written, as Spark Notes nicely states. Consequently, this lesson will introduce the framework for writing a two-column proof that will be used in subsequent lessons.

Deductive Reasoning – Lesson & Examples (Video)

39 min

  • Introduction to deductive reasoning
  • 00:00:25 – Overview of the laws of detachment and syllogism
  • 00:05:09 – Use the law of detachment to determine if the statement is valid (Examples #1-2)
  • 00:08:17 – Use the law of syllogism to write the statement that follows (Examples #3-5)
  • Exclusive Content for Member’s Only
  • 00:13:24 – Use logic to give a reason for each statement (Examples #6-11)
  • 00:24:22 – Name the definition used for each conclusion (Examples #12-16)
  • 00:30:46 – Draw a conclusion and name the definition used as the reason (Examples #17-19)
  • Practice Problems with Step-by-Step Solutions
  • Chapter Tests with Video Solutions

Get access to all the courses and over 450 HD videos with your subscription

Monthly and Yearly Plans Available

Get My Subscription Now

Still wondering if CalcWorkshop is right for you?
Take a Tour and find out how a membership can take the struggle out of learning math.


What is an example of Law of detachment?

1) If you are a penguin, then you live in the Southern Hemisphere. 2) You are a penguin. Let p be the statement "you are a penguin", let q be the statement "you live in the Southern Hemisphere". 1) If p , then q .

What is Law of Detachment in logic?

The Law of Detachment is the most commonly used principle of deductive reasoning. In words, this law says that whenever a conditional statement and its hypothesis are true, the conclusion is also true. That is, the conclusion can be “detached” from the conditional (see Example 2.2. 1).

What is the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism?

The law of detachment allows you to "detach" the hypothesis from the conclusion. More precisely, if we know both p and p → q to be true, then we may conclude that q is true.

What are the laws of deductive reasoning?

Deductive reasoning uses facts, definitions, accepted properties, and the laws of logic to reach a conclusion. It is about showing that conjectures are true or false. Law of Detachment: If the hypothesis of a true conditional statement is true, then the conclusion is also true.

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte