Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader. With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Show
Already have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Log in through your institution Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $41.50 USD. How does it work?
journal article Exchange and Symbolic Interaction: A Further Analysis of ConvergenceThe Pacific Sociological Review Vol. 17, No. 4 (Oct., 1974) , pp. 417-434 (18 pages) Published By: University of California Press https://doi.org/10.2307/1388549 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1388549
Read and download Log in through your school or library Alternate access options For independent researchers Read Online Read 100 articles/month free Subscribe to JPASS Unlimited reading + 10 downloads Purchase article $41.50 - Download now and later Abstract This paper continues the investigation of the relationship between exchange theory and symbolic interactionism which was initially stated by Singelmann (1972). He suggested a convergence of the two perspectives in which exchange was subsumed as symbolic interaction. The present work finds this general statement of convergence unacceptable because: (1) it ignores the substantively distinct variants of exchange theory; (2) it does not take into account the assumptions upon which the two perspectives are built; and (3) it assumes limitations in exchange and not symbolic interaction. Investigation along these three points reveals that reinforcement exchange is distinct from symbolic interactionism because of metatheoretical assumptions each makes concerning the human condition such as questions of rationality, social reality, and social order. While reinforcement exchange suggests synthesis, Blau's social exchange theory articulates this by modifying the exchange perspective using certain of the assumptions of symbolic interactionism. Publisher Information Founded in 1893, University of California Press, Journals and Digital Publishing Division, disseminates scholarship of enduring value. One of the largest, most distinguished, and innovative of the university presses today, its collection of print and online journals spans topics in the humanities and social sciences, with concentrations in sociology, musicology, history, religion, cultural and area studies, ornithology, law, and literature. In addition to publishing its own journals, the division also provides traditional and digital publishing services to many client scholarly societies and associations. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Log in through your institution Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $14.00 USD. Purchase this issue for $40.00 USD. Go to Table of Contents. How does it work?
journal article The Vitalization of Symbolic InteractionismSocial Psychology Quarterly Vol. 50, No. 1 (Mar., 1987) , pp. 83-94 (12 pages) Published By: American Sociological Association https://doi.org/10.2307/2786893 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2786893 Read and download Log in through your school or library Alternate access options For independent researchers Subscribe to JPASS Unlimited reading + 10 downloads Purchase article $14.00 - Download now and later Journal Information Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) publishes theoretical and empirical papers on the link between the individual and society, including the study of the relations of individuals to one another, as well as to groups, collectivities and institutions. It also includes the study of intra-individual processes insofar as they substantially influence or are influenced by social structure and process. SPQ is genuinely interdisciplinary, publishing works by both sociologists and psychologists. Published quarterly in March, June, September and December. Publisher Information American Sociological Association Mission Statement: Serving Sociologists in Their Work Advancing Sociology as a Science and Profession Promoting the Contributions and Use of Sociology to Society The American Sociological Association (ASA), founded in 1905, is a non-profit membership association dedicated to advancing sociology as a scientific discipline and profession serving the public good. With over 13,200 members, ASA encompasses sociologists who are faculty members at colleges and universities, researchers, practitioners, and students. About 20 percent of the members work in government, business, or non-profit organizations. As the national organization for sociologists, the American Sociological Association, through its Executive Office, is well positioned to provide a unique set of services to its members and to promote the vitality, visibility, and diversity of the discipline. Working at the national and international levels, the Association aims to articulate policy and impleme nt programs likely to have the broadest possible impact for sociology now and in the future. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. Which of the following is a criticism of symbolic interaction theory?Criticisms. Symbolic interactionists are often criticized for being overly impressionistic in their research methods and somewhat unsystematic in their theories. It is argued that the theory is not one theory, but rather, the framework for many different theories.
What is the symbolic interactionism theory?Symbolic interaction is one of the several theories in the social sciences. According to this theory, people live both in the natural and the symbolic environment. Symbolic interaction is a process that is enlivened the reciprocal meaning and values by aid of the symbols in the mind.
Which of the following is not a reasonable criticism of the symbolic interaction theories?Which of the following is NOT a criticism of symbolic interaction? Symbolic interaction ignores the influence of generalized others. One of the assumptions of Symbolic Interaction Theory states that meaning is modified through a static process.
Which of the following is an assumption of symbolic interaction theory?Symbolic interactionism theory assumes that people respond to elements of their environments according to the subjective meanings they attach to those elements, such as meanings being created and modified through social interaction involving symbolic communication with other people.
|
Which of the following correctly identifies a criticism of symbolic interaction theory?
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 IlerngutCOM Inc.
