Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.
Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in
Monthly Plan
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
Yearly Plan
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
Log in through your institution
journal article
Time, Money, and the Weather: Ming China and the "Great Depression" of the Mid-Fifteenth CenturyThe Journal of Asian Studies
Vol. 61, No. 1 (Feb., 2002)
, pp. 83-113 (31 pages)
Published By: Association for Asian Studies
//doi.org/10.2307/2700190
//www.jstor.org/stable/2700190
Read and download
Log in through your school or library
Alternate access options
For independent researchers
Read Online
Read 100 articles/month free
Subscribe to JPASS
Unlimited reading + 10 downloads
Journal Information
For 56 years, The Journal of Asian Studies has been recognized as the most authoritative and prestigious publication in the field of Asian Studies. This quarterly has been published regularly since November 1941, offering Asianists a wealth of information unavailable elsewhere. Each issue contains four to five feature articles on topics involving the history, arts, social sciences, philosophy, and contemporary issues of East, South, and Southeast Asia, as well as a large book review section.
Publisher Information
Formed in 1941, the Association for Asian Studies--the largest society of its kind in the world--is a scholarly, non-political, and non-profit professional association open to all persons interested in Asia. It seeks through publications, meetings, and seminars to facilitate contact and an exchange of information among scholars to increase their understanding of East, South, and Southeast Asia. For further information about AAS activities, publications, and membership, please see the AAS website: //www.asian-studies.org.
Rights & Usage
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to
our Terms and Conditions
The Journal of Asian Studies © 2002 Association for Asian Studies
Request Permissions
Was China More Productive Than Europe?, Part 1
When we think about the kind of trade taking place across the world in the 1600s and 1700s, and we recognize that Chinese finished goods are going to Europe in return for silver, this shouldn't be too great a surprise, since we know that if we go back several centuries to the Song dynasty that the first real urban commercial dynamism within Eurasia took place there.
A water-turned wheel for irrigation
There was an expansion of trade, the development of larger cities, the improvement of agricultural technologies to raise the yields of rice and other grains and crops on the land. And there was the development of transportation technologies to take advantage of river transport. Those developments start in China much earlier on a broader spatial scale than they do anywhere else in the world. And therefore in the year 1100, the most developed economy in the world was certainly in China.
And it's that lead, as it were, that China developed, beginning in roughly 1000, that remained in place for several centuries. Eurasian economies grew and contracted in this preindustrial area, but in essence, the Chinese economy remained a very productive economy for the following 500 years, so that when trade started to take place between China and Europe, fueled by the American silver that the Europeans were bringing to China, it was not surprising that the Chinese economy was, in certain ways at least, a more productive economy.
A water-powered pounding mill. China had captured the energy of water by the first or second century AD
We can only understand this contrast if we're aware of the Chinese economy beginning in the year 1000. If we tell our stories about global economic history beginning with European explorations in the late fifteenth century, we don't pick up the story until the time when Europeans themselves started to develop economically. We don't take into consideration that the Chinese had, in earlier centuries, already achieved levels of productivity that the Europeans only started to achieve in the 1500s.