7 types of organizational structures (+ org charts for implementation)Reading time: about 7 min Show
Posted by: Shannon Williams
At some point, you have likely seen an organizational chart for your company. And we can probably guess what it looked like. The typical org chart looks like a pyramid, your C-level executives at the top with lines stretching down to middle management and finally staff-level employees. But not every company functions best with a hierarchical organizational structure. Many types of organizational charts exist because many types of organizational structures exist. Let’s go through the seven common types of org structures and reasons why you might consider each of them. 1. Hierarchical org structureThe pyramid-shaped organizational chart we referred to earlier is known as a hierarchical org chart. It’s the most common type of organizational structure—the chain of command goes from the top (e.g., the CEO or manager) down (e.g., entry-level and low-level employees), and each employee has a supervisor. Pros
Cons
2. Functional org structureSimilar to a hierarchical organizational structure, a functional org structure starts with positions with the highest levels of responsibility at the top and goes down from there. Primarily, though, employees are organized according to their specific skills and their corresponding function in the company. Each separate department is managed independently. Pros
Cons
3. Horizontal or flat org structureA horizontal or flat organizational structure fits companies with few levels between upper management and staff-level employees. Many start-up businesses use a horizontal org structure before they grow large enough to build out different departments, but some organizations maintain this structure since it encourages less supervision and more involvement from all employees. Pros
Cons
4. Divisional org structureIn divisional organizational structures, a company’s divisions have control over their own resources, essentially operating like their own company within the larger organization. Each division can have its own marketing team, sales team, IT team, etc. This structure works well for large companies as it empowers the various divisions to make decisions without everyone having to report to just a few executives. Depending on your organization’s focus, there are a few variations to consider. Market-based divisional org structureDivisions are separated by market, industry, or customer type. A large consumer goods company, like Target or Walmart, might separate its durable goods (clothing, electronics, furniture, etc.) from its food or logistics divisions. Product-based divisional org structureDivisions are separated by product line. For example, a tech company might have a division dedicated to its cloud offerings, while the rest of the divisions focus on the different software offerings—e.g., Adobe and its creative suite of Illustrator, Photoshop, InDesign, etc. Geographic divisional org structureDivisions are separated by region, territories, or districts, offering more effective localization and logistics. Companies might establish satellite offices across the country or the globe in order to stay close to their customers.
Pros
Cons
5. Matrix org structureA matrix organizational chart looks like a grid, and it shows cross-functional teams that form for special projects. For example, an engineer may regularly belong to the engineering department (led by an engineering director) but work on a temporary project (led by a project manager). The matrix org chart accounts for both of these roles and reporting relationships. Pros
Cons
6. Team-based org structureIt’ll come as no surprise that a team-based organizational structure groups employees according to (what else?) teams—think Scrum teams or tiger teams. A team organizational structure is meant to disrupt the traditional hierarchy, focusing more on problem-solving, cooperation, and giving employees more control. Pros
Cons
See why forming tiger teams is a smart move for your organization. Learn more 7. Network org structureThese days, few businesses have all their services under one roof, and juggling the multitudes of vendors, subcontractors, freelancers, offsite locations, and satellite offices can get confusing. A network organizational structure makes sense of the spread of resources. It can also describe an internal structure that focuses more on open communication and relationships rather than hierarchy. Pros
Cons
Consider the needs of your organization, including the company culture that you want to develop, and choose one of these organizational structures. Once you've chosen the right org structure to pursue, learn the steps in the company reorganization process. Read more Which of the following is an advantage of maintaining an organizational chart?Advantages of Organizational Charts
Shows clear reporting structure – employees know who to report to, who to contact when there is an issue that needs resolving or a question that needs to be answered. This is especially important in large organizations where there are many departments.
Which of the following terms refers to the interaction of two or more individuals such that their combined efforts?Synergism comes from the Greek word "synergos" meaning working together. It refers to the interaction between two or more "things" when the combined effect is greater than if you added the "things" on their own (a type of "when is one plus one is greater than two" effect).
What is an external force that is creating change for organizations?External Forces of Organizational Change
Economic Forces: The economic forces influence organization's change management strategy by either presenting opportunities or challenges in the form of economic uncertainties or growing competitive pressures.
What are characteristics of simple structure in business organization choose every correct answer?Simple structure is a basic organizational design structure with low departmentalization, little work specialization, wide spans of control, centralized authority (typically the owner has most of the power) and little formalization or rules that govern operation.
|