Which theory suggests that factor resource endowments determine a nations comparative advantage?

Abstract

According to the classical theory of international trade, countries specialise in producing those goods in which they have a comparative advantage over their competitors, and then obtain their other commodity requirements by exchanging domestically produced goods for imports which they are not able to produce economically themselves. Historically the trade of the countries of the Middle East has tended to conform to this pattern, although, increasingly, government regulation of economic affairs has meant that the trade flows predicted by classical laissez-faire models have tended to be distorted. A country’s comparative advantage in the production of a particular commodity is of course determined by what is usually referred to as its ‘factor endowment’, or in other words, the local availability of resources such as labour, agricultural land, mineral resources, capital or technology. Thus, for example, Egypt which has abundant cheap labour, and a good supply of fertile irrigated land, has specialised in cotton production for which its climate is well suited, and for over a century has traded cotton exports for imports of manufactured goods.1 Similarly, for hundreds of years Iran has specialised in carpet production, with the skilled weavers of Tabriz and Isfahan using local wool from the mountains. Neighbouring Iraq has specialised in dates,while in North Yemen the main export has been coffee.

Keywords

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Comparative Advantage
  • Middle East
  • Capital Formation
  • Factor Endowment

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 1

  1. For a detailed account of Egypt’s emergence as a cotton exporter see Robert Owen, Cotton and the Egyptian Economy 1820–1914 (Oxford University Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert Mabro, ‘Employment and Wages in Dual Agriculture’, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 23, No. 3 (1971) 401–17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Labour Organisation, Rural Employment Problems in the U.A.R. (Geneva, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bent Hansen, ‘Employment and Wages in Rural Egypt’, American Economic Review, Vol. LIX (1969) 298–313.

    Google Scholar 

  5. In spite of this high population growth, per capita incomes have risen however in most countries in the area. See Galal Amin, The Modernization of Poverty (E. J. Brill, Leiden, 1974), Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. In fact there is perhaps over-urbanisation. See Galal Amin, The Modernization of Poverty (E. J. Brill, Leiden, 1974), Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keith McLachlan, Planning and Industrialisation in Iran (Focus Research, 1975). See also earlier 1974 report on Iran by Focus Research.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rodney Wilson ‘Business Climate Remains Favourable for Foreign Investors and Contractors’, The Times Supplement on Egypt 26 March 1975. Also later article by the author in The Times 5 November 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert Stevens, The Arabs’ New Frontier: A History of the Kuwait Fund ( Temple Smith, London, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Z. Aliber, ‘Oil and the Money Crunch’, National Westminster Bank Review, February 1975;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jan Tumlir, ‘Oil Payments and Oil Debt in the World Economy’, Lloyds Bank Review (June 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Minos Zombanakis, ‘Arab Funds and the Markets’, The Banker (July 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics (December 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Although they will have to improve on their previous industrial performance as outlined by Julian Bharier, Economic Development in Iran 1900–1970 (Oxford University Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  15. As the authors of most introductory texts on development emphasise at the start. See Walter Elkan, An Introduction to Development Economics (Penguin, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Also Matthew McQueen, The Economics of Development (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

  1. Rodney Wilson

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

© 1977 Rodney Wilson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, R. (1977). The Factor Endowment. In: Trade and Investment in the Middle East. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03299-0_1

Download citation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03299-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03301-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03299-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)

Which theory is also called as factor endowment theory?

The H-O theory is also known as the factor- proportions theory or factor-endowment theory. A principal result of the H-O theory is the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem which states the following. A nation will export the product that uses its most abundant factor intensively.

What is the basis for comparative advantage in the factor endowment model?

A comparative advantage exists when the opportunity cost of specialization is lower than that of other nations. The existence of a comparative advantage is, in turn, affected by things such as abundance, productivity, cost of labor, land, and capital.

What is two factor endowment theory?

The factor endowment theory holds that countries are likely to be abundant in different types of resources. In economic reasoning, the simplest case for this distribution is the idea that countries will have different ratios of capital to labor. Factor endowment theory is used to determine comparative advantage.

Which theory suggests that nations will develop comparative advantages based on their locally abundant factors?

The factor endowment theory is identified as: A theory that suggests that nations will develop comparative advantages based on their locally abundant factors. The national competitive advantage of industries depends on: Firm strategy, structure, and rivalry.